Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Use

It is with great interest buy strattera read the article Marik and Careau


(chest, January 1999). Despite some setbacks


(fast transport, adequate transport medium, and inoculation on


specific media under anaerobic conditions), only one anaerobic bacteria >> << was isolated in this study leads to the conclusion that


anaerobic bacteria can not be involved in these infections


and antibiotics effective against anaerobic bacteria can not be


useful as empirical treatment in these situations. However, it is good


known that the concentration of anaerobic bacteria in the mouth of the pharynx is


higher than aerobic bacteria. These bacteria colonize the oropharynx


responsible for nosocomial pneumonia. Thus, the inability to distinguish >> << anaerobic bacteria in this study was surprising. Use


specific conditions of transport and culture, we could identify a high percentage >> << anaerobic cultures of protected brush specimens (PSB) at


reasons for pneumonia

patients with ventilator-pneumonia (VAP). These >> << significant differences between the results of Marik and Careau and our


could be due to technical differences in laboratory procedures


used to recover anaerobic bacteria from Promsvyazbank. First, we used just


ready meat yeast VL agar (Sanofi Pasteur, Marnes La Coquette, France


) for anaerobic culture. This medium is prepared twice a week >> << and supplemented with 8% sheep blood and gentamicin menadyona,


makes this medium selective for anaerobes. Second, anaerobic atmosphere >> << received in Oxoid jar with Anaerogen Oxoid system


(Oxoid; Beyzinhstouk, England), which gives better results than other >> << test systems (unpublished data). Finally, 2 of 20 technicians in our lab


specifically designed for anaerobic bacteria


Front because their skills in the study of these bacteria. However, a potential concern with antibiotics effective against >> << anaerobic bacteria in patients with nosocomial pneumonia


remains controversial. We recently reported that patients with


VAP receiving well-adapted empiric antibiotherapy against anaerobic bacteria


was the best result in D10. In addition, a recent large study compared the efficacy


ceftazidime against piperacillin-tazobaktam in ICU patients with VAP,


mortality was lower in patients receiving piperacillin-tazobaktam than


patients treated with ceftazidime. Although anaerobic bacteria >> << were not specifically investigated in this study, we


assume that the mortality difference can be explained partly >> << better activity of piperacillin-tazobaktam, than ceftazidime on


anaerobes, which could be associated with aerobic bacteria in


patients with VAP. Finally, because anaerobic bacteria are numerous in the oropharynx >> << and because colonized oropharyngeal content leads to nosocomial pneumonia


, anaerobes associated with aerobic bacteria should be isolated >> << in patients with VAP or aspiration pneumonia. Moreover


several arguments suggest considering these bacteria in the selection


empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with VAP. .


No comments:

Post a Comment